Happy Spring! I hope you are all enjoying the returning warmth after a long winter. Just as the landscape shifts around us, PAM is entering its own season of transition – moving past a period of uncertainty and stepping into a spring defined by new beginnings.
At our most recent meeting, the PAM Executive Board approved the charge and membership for the PAM Transition Team, which will be exploring our options for continuing as a community within the ASIS&T organization. The team’s goal is to recommend the path that will best honor our legacy, preserve our unique PAM character, and maintain our strong vendor relationships while taking into account the ways in which members’ roles and capacity are changing. The team consists of the Executive Board plus three additional PAM members: Brian Quigley (chair), Kayleigh Bohémier, Nicholas Dehler, Jerrel Horn, Nastasha Johnson, John Kromer, and Henrik Spoon. We hope to have a recommendation ready by late April and plan to host a town hall in May to discuss it.
I am also pleased to announce that I have finished appointing our PAM committees for the year. Even during this transitional year, we continue to support each other through awards, professional development, mentoring, watercoolers, newsletters, and more.
Archives
Lance Utley
Awards
Jeff Bond (chair)
John Kromer
NuRee Lee
Bulletin
John Kromer (editor)
Ruth Kneale (assistant editor)
Jerrel Horn (past editor)
Hospitality
Jenny Mueller-Alexander (chair)
Industry Partner Relations
Jerrel Horn (chair)
Megan Powell
Outreach
Jenny Hart (chair)
Nicholas Dehler
Khue Duong
Danny Dotson (watercoolers host)
Lance Utley (PAMnet listserv manager)
Professional Development
Kayleigh Bohémier
Sydney Burke
Phillip Jaffe
Alex Threlkeld
A huge thank you to our new and returning committee members! And to everyone who considered serving – we appreciate your dedication to PAM’s mission. It’s the collective energy of this entire group that makes our work possible. Here’s to a productive and rewarding year ahead.
This summer’s Information Science Summit & Special Libraries Conference is shaping up to be a standout event. Between a timely keynote, a program packed with cutting-edge presentations, and a strong showing from our PAM exhibitors, the schedule is bursting with value. And, of course, the Dance Party tradition is back! A huge thank you to the Conference Planning Committee for their tireless work in bringing this vision to life.
PAM members have also been hard at work on our programming for the conference. We’ve had three proposals accepted as sessions:
Physics, Astronomy & Mathematics Roundtable (moderators: Meg Eastwood, Jeffra Bussmann)
PAM Industry Partner Roundtable: Constantly Evolving Business Models and Publishing Initiatives (moderators: Sandy Avila, Chris Doty)
LaTeX in the Library: Compiling What our Libraries Do and How (presenters: Kayleigh Bohémier, Samuel Hansen, Alex Threlkeld)
While still in the planning stages, we will also have our PAM Dinner on either Sunday or Monday night plus an informal no-host dine around on the other night. Over the summer, after the conference, we plan to have a virtual business meeting plus three virtual roundtables for Astronomy, Mathematics, and Physics. Stay tuned for more information!
Volume 53, Issue 2 —— Spring 2026 Meg Eastwood and Jeffra Bussmann
This year’s June ASIS&T conference will feature a combined Physics, Astronomy, and Mathematics (PAM) Roundtable. Roundtables at our new conference are limited to one hour, so we’re going to split into three groups / tables, discuss separate topics, then come back together before the end of the hour to share out the discussion points from all three tables.
The first table discussion will focus on our experiences with generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) – how has AI changed our interactions with faculty and students? We will tackle questions such as, how are your faculty members discouraging or encouraging students to use AI in their work? How do you demonstrate the value of a library database when AI is freely and readily available? Has AI saved you time in any areas of your work? We’ll provide a selection of university policies on the use of generative AI in classrooms and in research.
The second table discussion will consider recent developments in the Open Access (OA) landscape. The Gates Foundation decided to stop paying Article Processing Charges (APCs) for Gold OA in 2025 and instructed grantees to post preprints instead – will other funders follow their lead? How are your faculty reacting to the cost of Gold OA? In the world of Green OA, how have publishers in PAM areas responded to recent agency implementations of the 2022 OSTP (Office of Science and Technology Policy) Public Access Memo? PAM publishers have led the way in pioneering models such as subscribe-to-open – is your library participating in any subscribe-to-open or other “Diamond” OA programs? Finally, what are your preferred methods for encouraging open access? We will provide statistics on the average cost of APCs and comparisons of current publisher policies.
Our third table discussion will talk over the year’s most challenging issues in reference, instruction, and collections. How have your reference practices changed? Are you using any new software or methods to enliven your instruction? In a time of drastic budget cuts, how do we prioritize spending our remaining funds? Do you have recommendations on collection analysis techniques, to prepare for upcoming budget cuts? This table will be organized in a more “unconference” style, where participants drive the topics, although we will provide a list of potential discussion questions.
Please feel free to reach out if there are particular discussion questions you’d like us to include – we hope to see you in Albuquerque!
We would like to welcome all Physics, Astronomy, and Mathematics Librarians and related Industry Partners to the PAMily Discord.
Discord is a technology tool like Slack and Facebook that allows group conversation and sharing around topics of interest. In our Discord, there are multiple areas for people to have conversations about specific topics — or even to share photos of pets, plan and take pictures of spontaneous PAMily meetups at other conferences and events, and share optimism and fun.
It’s been a nerve-wracking fiscal year so far for all of us in the (US-based) PAM libraries. After the President was elected, he and his new Cabinet were extremely clear in their anti-science bias. That led to the utter massacre that was DOGE. Between that disaster, and some organizations’ anticipatory cutting of budgets, massive damage has been done to science in the US. For example, NASA’s astrophysics research division was facing a 44% cut1, which would have defunded an astonishing 41 programs, including OSIRIS-APEX, Keck Observatory, and Chandra X-Ray Observatory. Additionally, all money going towards STEM engagement (which includes REU programs) would be cut. The budget threats across the board were, frankly, terrifying from a science point of view.
Thankfully, albeit with a lot of effort and strain, the 2026 Appropriations budget was approved at a nearly-flat rate for the NSF and NASA2. However, that didn’t mean the crisis was over…
Many organizations, whether hit by the DOGE chainsaw or suffering from the enactment of as-yet unapproved budget cuts, began FY2026 by cutting their budgets and laying off staff. I’ve heard back from a few folks to my PAMnet message who shared similar stories: their institutions restructured in some way, or faced loss of grants (note: NSF-wide, there have been almost 2,000 grants cancelled so far3), that required astronomers and other scientists to take a serious hit to their salaries. This led to the departure of said staff, and we all know if the staff numbers go down, so does the library’s budget. A couple of librarians reported they’d had to cancel subscriptions as a direct result. Thankfully, no one has reported they had any layoffs of staff, but tension is high as we approach budgeting for FY27.
One of the most visible impacts late last year was the abrupt closure of the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) library, which was nominally part of a planned physical reorganization of the campus, but came as a surprise to a lot of the scientific and library community4. According to an article from the New York Times5, “a NASA spokesman said the agency would review the library holdings over the next 60 days and some material would be stored in a government warehouse while the rest would be tossed away.” I’m sorry, tossed away? That library contained not only many older paper-based resources that aren’t available online, it also had “specialized equipment and electronics designed to test spacecraft [that] have been removed and thrown out”. This is just horrifying to me. The library is not the only part of the GSFC being targeted; between the DOGE layoffs, the office and building closures, and the sudden closure of the Goddard Institute for Space Studies, there’s a fear that the entire shebang will be gone by the end of FY2026.
Closer to home are cuts to the NSF that can possibly impact what I consider “my” observatories – cuts to both the National Solar Observatory, which runs the Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope (DKIST), and the National Optical-Infrared Astronomy Research Laboratories (NOIRLab), which runs the Gemini Observatories. Both observatories skinned through the FY2026 budget approval process, but are in the process of having to plan for the worst. NOIRLab could be facing huge cuts, at the levels where Gemini will be operationally reduced by 50%, making it hard to actually operate it; ownership of Kitt Peak National Observatory and Cerro Tololo International Observatory would actually be transferred somewhere else; and the brand-new Vera C. Rubin Observatory, which is transitioning from construction to operations and was expecting an appropriately-sized budget increase, will get, at most, half of that6. As for DKIST, still my home and only operating for a couple of years, the threatened FY26 budget was for only $13M. “To put it bluntly,” [DKIST Director] Keller said, “for DKIST, at $13 million, we cannot operate. There’s no way for us to operate such a complex facility.”7 I just can’t wrap my mind around the possibility that the NSO would have to mothball the world’s most powerful solar telescope only a couple of years after bringing it online.
So, what can we do? Right now, not much, it seems. Protect our budgets as much as possible, continue to keep our scientists and senior administrators aware of our values, and write to our representatives and senators of our concerns. Handwritten letters, especially, carry a lot of weight, but even e-mail and typed letters are taken seriously.
More than ever, I think we need to save as much data as possible (i.e. LOCKSS). We need to be civically involved so our Senators and Representatives know how much we value science. And we can remember the song “Light One Candle,” by Peter, Paul & Mary from 1982. It’s a peace anthem and struggle for justice, and the chorus gave me goosebumps:
Don’t let the light go out It’s lasted for so many years Don’t let the light go out Let it shine through our love and our tears
Ah, the 70s. The time of Elvis and his Hawaiian concert (the first worldwide telecast by an entertainer watched by more people than watched the Apollo moon landings!), LexisNexis, Skylab, the completion of the world’s tallest building (Sears Tower, 1,451 ft), the publication of The Princess Bride by William Goldman, and the launch of Pioneer 10, which later sent back the first close-up images of Jupiter.
And the publication of Bulletin #1 by the provisional PAM Division in September 1973!
The SLA Annual Conference was held in Pittsburgh, June 11-13, 1973. Our Executive Board, 1973-74, was:
Chairman: Mr. Allen Wynne, Math-Physics Library, University of Colorado
Past-Chairman (Acting): Mr. Jack Weigel, Physics-Astronomy Library, University of Michigan
Secretary: Mrs. Jean K. Martin, Physics-Math-Astronomy Library, University of Texas
Treasurer: Mrs. Berle G. Reiter, V. G. Grove Library, Wells Hall
We sponsored 3 programs. Attendance ranged from 20-30, a nice showing for provisional programs! They were titled:
Fundamentals of Managing an Astronomy Collection
Past Use as a Guide to Future Development of a Math Branch Library
Professional Society Publishing in the Mathematical and Physical Sciences: Current Programs and Future Problems
Our Acting Chairman, Jack Weigel, presided over the 1973 Business Meeting:
The slate of candidates was introduced, and approved.
The Division Bylaws, which had been shared in advance, were discussed and approved.
Clarification was given to the 2-year Provisional status the Division had been granted in 1972.
It was announced that the new Chairman, Allen Wynne, would also be the Conference Coordinator for 1974’s meeting in Toronto, Canada, with Louise Seidler as Program Chairwoman.
The decision to create and publish a PAM Division Directory was made.
Other Highlights from the Bulletin include:
Chatter from the Chairman, where Mr. Weigel shared his and others’ ideas for ways to bring our group closer together, and common projects that could be of use. They include:
A Union List of Astronomy Serials for North America
Traveling Exhibits in Astronomy
Visual Aids for Physics Classroom Presentations
Comparison of University Physics, Astronomy and Mathematics Collections
Membership Drive Underway
More than ever at this time, we needed members, so we could reach full Division status. Membership Chairman was Kathryn Strand of the High Altitude Observatory Library, and she had a lot of work to do.
Thanks to Members
As we’ve noted in our PAM Histories, we owe a lot to Jack Weigel. This section acknowledges the hard work he and Christine Bain did to get the provisional group up and running, and Jack and Kimyo Hom for their fine 1973 conference planning.
Plans for the PAM Division Newsletter
The beauty that is the PAM Bulletin was launched, as Jean K. Martin (Acting Editor) passed the baton – and the forms – on to Virginia Van Brunt, Librarian, National Radio Astronomy Observatory.
Also, don’t forget to check ASIS&T’s Upcoming Events calendar for Committee meetings. Know of another Boot Camp or conference that the PAMily might want to hear about? Let Ruth Kneale know!
A huge welcome to Lorna Mitchell, who has joined Royal Observatory Edinburgh as the new Librarian! We wish the best to Karen Moran, who retired in September last year.
Following his supervisor’s retirement, Brian Quigley has been serving as the Interim Associate University Librarian for Educational Initiatives & User Services at UC Berkeley since early January. His interim role is expected to last 12-18 months. Brian also participated in a recent oral history project, Librarians Navigating Change, in which he discusses his perspective on change over his 25 years at Berkeley.
OK, my dear PAMily. I want you to stop what you’re doing – or reading – and go get this book. I’ll be honest, I don’t care what the container is – just get it. It’s about a guy who just broke up with his girlfriend but is still watching her snooty cat for her for the weekend – and then the alien apocalypse arrives.
Carl has had enough. Princess Donut the Queen Anne Chonk has had more than enough. How are they going to get through the alien-wrought dungeon and survive? Let me tell you: it’s messy. It’s bloody. And it’s hilarious.
I had a friend recommend this to me earlier this year. I ripped through it in a weekend and had read the entire series by the end of the month. And – AND – I bought it in both e- and physical formats. I’ve since read it through again, and I can’t promise I won’t do it a third time before Book #8 arrives in May.
Constantly Evolving Business Models and Publishing Initiatives
Volume 53, Issue 2 —— Spring 2026 Sandy Avila and Chris Doty
The time-constrained and relatively generic description of the PAM Industry Partners Roundtable at the 2026 Information Science Summit and Special Libraries Conference can be found at the conference website. [ https://www.asist.org/iss-slc26/iss-slc26-accepted-presentations/ ]
If you have additional PLP topics (or non-PLP topics) you’d like to see covered, please reach out to Sandy or Chris. They are also seeking input on the session’s format. Do people want a standard format for this type of session – 30-40 minutes of presentations, followed by 20-30 minutes of open discussion and audience Q&A – or something more interactive?